posted Oct 17th, 2005 -
It is official now, the Air Sport General Commission (CASI) of the FAI (Fédération Aéronautique Internationale) changed the eligibility rules for international competitors who want to compete for a different nation after representing another country at a previous event and a "banned period".
|| Former IPC President BJ Worth at an FAI/IPC meeting in 2002
The NSL News recently resumed this topic since the CASI meeting took place last week, and two world class 4-way competitors have been involved in the issue surrounding the so-called "Pete Allum Case". The rule change might have an impact on the competition for medals at next year's World Championship of Formation Skydiving in Germany.
BJ Worth, former President of the IPC (International Parachuting Commission), who was in Paris and assigned to a possible International Tribunal for the controversial case, informed the skydiving community inofficially with an update on Saturday last week:
|Hello "Friends of Fair Play,"|
The FAI General Conference and 100th birthday of FAI has just been concluded. Just before the start of this meeting, CASI (consisting of ten FAI national delegates and ten Air Sport Commission Presidents) addressed the appeal by Italy in which CASI was asked to reconsider its earlier decision to interpret the "3-year rule" as a fixed 1095 days, regardless of the competition cycles involved. CASI debated the issue thoroughly, and then reversed its earlier decision, by adopting the following policy / rule:
"After a person has represented a country in a First Category event, that person must not represent another country in a First Category event during the entire two calendar years (1 January to 31 December) following the calendar year in which the person represented the first country."
This afternoon, a member of CASI told me that this decision was probably not passed on to the FAI Delegate of Italy during the General Conference, due to all the other issues that were addressed. However, FAI HQ will soon send news of this decision to the NAC of Italy. Italy's NAC leadership will be asked if this new ruling satisfies the concern it raised with regard to CASI's support of the IPC's original interpretation of this ruling. This official process is likely to take a couple weeks. However, this ruling is official - pending an unlikely appeal by the NAC of Italy. This information may be distributed to any and all interested parties.
BJ's announcement was confirmed today by FAI Secretary General Max Bishop in a message directly to the NSL News. He mentioned that it will still take some time until the exact language will be posted. However, the decision has been made, and the new eligibility rule comes out well defined and with no room for misunderstandings:
|The new wording of the Sporting Code in this connection is still being fine-tuned by the lawyers. However, the principle that has been adopted by CASI is essentially that, after representing one country, two whole calendar years (1st January to 31 December) must elapse before a competitor can represent another. So if a person represents Utopia in 2005 s/he cannot represent Shangrila until 2008. The precise dates of the contests within those years are immaterial.|
With best regards,